I did warn you...
Screaming at the Wind
They found a cure
For what ails you
For cancer and depression too
And put their fingers in their ears
as hard as they bloody well could...
What's the fucking point
Of telling people what's killing them
When they don't bloody want to hear
Preferring Fairy Tales
Preferring to die
Than read labels
They found a cure
And they knew it
And somebody even tried to tell you
That chronic illness of yours
It might be
It just might be...
And though it was your cure -
You put your fingers in your ears
As hard as you bloody well could
Because your drug that wasn't a drug
Has you hooked
Line and sinker
Because that drug that isn't a drug
Is your social drug of choice.
A..J. Ponder - author page
(BSc Hons- genetics/biochem...)
I don't normally do this with my quals but they are relevant
I could say get tested for Coeliac today, and I suppose 80% is an ok indication - but it's not good enough. 100% specificity is not the same as 100% accuracy not when researchers say traditional "coeliac" is the tip of the iceberg and may be irrelevant anyway. In fact despite the high mortality and associated diseases I got the strong impression after reading the Christchurch study and several others, that many specialists don't like diagnosing without actual stomach problems-- not because of health issues, but because of social ones.
That's my rant. Rant over. Your health. Your life. Your choice.
Summary of the Christchurch study. http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1189/767/
the study itself - http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1189/772/
and afew other odds and sods
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/339/sep17_1/b3674 (the why we don't screen argument)
http://psy.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/45/4/325 (psych stuff)